Ecuador vs Libya: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Ecuador
0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.0613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
115th
Libya rank
117th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Libya
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 115th and Libya ranks 117th of 148 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0968 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0615 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0792 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.1112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0354 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Libya?
Ecuador, at 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Libya?
0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Libya rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 115th and Libya ranks 117th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Libya: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/libya/">Ecuador vs Libya: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.