Chile vs Sri Lanka: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chile
0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.6189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
57th
Sri Lanka rank
54th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chile
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.6189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.1345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.2419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.6683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.7047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.5622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.648 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0858 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.5096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6709 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.6189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Sri Lanka?
0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sri Lanka: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/">Chile vs Sri Lanka: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.