Chile vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chile
0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
57th
Mozambique rank
58th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chile
  • Mozambique
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 57th and Mozambique ranks 58th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.1345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.2419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.6683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.7047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0464 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.5622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.5096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Mozambique?
Chile, at 0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Mozambique?
0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mozambique rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 57th and Mozambique ranks 58th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/mozambique/">Chile vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.