Cameroon vs Jamaica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Cameroon
1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
36th
Jamaica rank
39th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Cameroon
  • Jamaica
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Cameroon ranks 36th and Jamaica ranks 39th of 148 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0453 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.0745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.0519 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.0904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.695 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.4769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.9818 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Cameroon or Jamaica?
Cameroon, at 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Cameroon and Jamaica?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Jamaica rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Cameroon ranks 36th and Jamaica ranks 39th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Jamaica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/jamaica/">Cameroon vs Jamaica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.