Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.5209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
64th
El Salvador rank
61st

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • El Salvador
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.5209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 61st of 148 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3633 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.3361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.4129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.4546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.5209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
0.0459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 61st of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/el-salvador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.