Barbados vs Japan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Barbados
0.9209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.8899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
44th
Japan rank
45th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Barbados
  • Japan
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.9209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Barbados ranks 44th and Japan ranks 45th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3933 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.5212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.665 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.9107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.7405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.921 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0821 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Barbados or Japan?
Barbados, at 0.9209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Barbados and Japan?
0.031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Japan rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Barbados ranks 44th and Japan ranks 45th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Japan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/japan/">Barbados vs Japan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.