Barbados vs Ghana: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Barbados
0.9209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana
0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
44th
Ghana rank
46th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Barbados
  • Ghana
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.9209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.1242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 44th and Ghana ranks 46th of 148 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.5212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.9107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.7405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3375 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.403 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4537 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Barbados or Ghana?
Barbados, at 0.9209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Barbados and Ghana?
0.1242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Ghana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Ghana rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Barbados ranks 44th and Ghana ranks 46th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Ghana: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ghana/">Barbados vs Ghana: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.