Austria vs Nicaragua: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Austria
0.3131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Nicaragua
0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
79th
Nicaragua rank
81st

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Austria
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.3131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 79th and Nicaragua ranks 81st of 148 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0708 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1970s 0.1387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1980s 0.1301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0684 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.2044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0.3045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1733 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Austria or Nicaragua?
Austria, at 0.3131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2017.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Austria and Nicaragua?
0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Nicaragua?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Austria and Nicaragua rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Austria ranks 79th and Nicaragua ranks 81st of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Nicaragua: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/austria/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/austria/nicaragua/">Austria vs Nicaragua: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.