Australia vs Sweden: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Australia
0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Australia rank
131st
Sweden rank
134th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Australia
  • Sweden
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 131st and Sweden ranks 134th of 148 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Australia or Sweden?
Australia, at 0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Australia and Sweden?
0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Australia and Sweden rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Australia ranks 131st and Sweden ranks 134th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sweden: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/sweden/">Australia vs Sweden: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.