Australia vs Norway: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Australia
0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
131st
Norway rank
132nd

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Australia
  • Norway
0.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Australia ranks 131st and Norway ranks 132nd of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Australia or Norway?
Australia, at 0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Australia and Norway?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Norway rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Australia ranks 131st and Norway ranks 132nd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Norway: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/norway/">Australia vs Norway: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.