Argentina vs Brazil: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Argentina
0.2481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.2373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
87th
Brazil rank
88th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Argentina
  • Brazil
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.2481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 87th and Brazil ranks 88th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Brazil in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0342 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.1091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.1268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.1259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.1693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Argentina or Brazil?
Argentina, at 0.2481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Argentina and Brazil?
0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Argentina ranks 87th and Brazil ranks 88th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Brazil: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/">Argentina vs Brazil: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.