Angola vs Nicaragua: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Angola
0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
82nd
Nicaragua rank
81st

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Angola
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Angola ranks 82nd and Nicaragua ranks 81st of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0541 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.0663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.1775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.2392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Angola or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Angola and Nicaragua?
0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Nicaragua rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Angola ranks 82nd and Nicaragua ranks 81st of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Nicaragua: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/nicaragua/">Angola vs Nicaragua: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.