Angola vs Malaysia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Angola
0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.2737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
82nd
Malaysia rank
84th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Angola
  • Malaysia
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Angola ranks 82nd and Malaysia ranks 84th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0172 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 0.0663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.1775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2302 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.2392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0369 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Angola or Malaysia?
Angola, at 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Angola and Malaysia?
0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Malaysia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Angola ranks 82nd and Malaysia ranks 84th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Malaysia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/malaysia/">Angola vs Malaysia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.