New Zealand vs Paraguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

New Zealand
3.62 % change on previous year
in 2024
Paraguay
4.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand rank
55th
Paraguay rank
53rd

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Paraguay
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 4.08 % change on previous year against 3.62 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.46 % change on previous year.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 55th and Paraguay ranks 53rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Paraguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 5.19 % change on previous year 3.23 % change on previous year 1.96 % change on previous year New Zealand
1970s 1.57 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year 0.9475 % change on previous year Paraguay
1980s 5.78 % change on previous year 2.59 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s 6.61 % change on previous year 3.79 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 1.05 % change on previous year -0.9016 % change on previous year 1.95 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s -3.94 % change on previous year 2.63 % change on previous year 6.57 % change on previous year Paraguay
2020s 0.2098 % change on previous year -1.72 % change on previous year 1.93 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), New Zealand or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 4.08 % change on previous year against 3.62 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between New Zealand and Paraguay?
0.46 % change on previous year, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Paraguay rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
New Zealand ranks 55th and Paraguay ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Paraguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/paraguay/">New Zealand vs Paraguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 11,115 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.