Belgium vs Polynesia: Tobacco — Production
Tobacco — Production over time
- Belgium
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 210 t against 190 t in Belgium, a difference of 20 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 110th and Polynesia ranks 107th of 131 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 780.9 t | 167 t | 613.9 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 179 t | 208.5 t | 29.5 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tobacco — production, Belgium or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 210 t against 190 t in Belgium as of 2013.
- What is the difference in tobacco — production between Belgium and Polynesia?
- 20 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Polynesia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Belgium and Polynesia rank globally for tobacco — production?
- Belgium ranks 110th and Polynesia ranks 107th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.