China, Taiwan Province of vs Philippines: Tobacco — Processing

China, Taiwan Province of
-13,636 t
in 2013
Philippines
-21,909 t
in 2013
China, Taiwan Province of rank
14th
Philippines rank
17th

Tobacco — Processing over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Philippines
-25.0k-20.0k-15.0k-10.0k-5.0k0196119872013

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports -13,636 t against -21,909 t in Philippines, a difference of 8,273 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 17th of 23 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s -6,011 t -2,673 t 3,338 t Philippines
1970s -14,784 t -4,633 t 10,151 t Philippines
1980s -21,251 t -6,000 t 15,251 t Philippines
1990s -20,052 t -6,587 t 13,464 t Philippines
2000s -15,294 t -16,594 t 1,300 t China, Taiwan Province of
2010s -14,091 t -21,909 t 7,818 t China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — processing, China, Taiwan Province of or Philippines?
China, Taiwan Province of, at -13,636 t against -21,909 t in Philippines as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — processing between China, Taiwan Province of and Philippines?
8,273 t, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Philippines?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Philippines rank globally for tobacco — processing?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 17th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Philippines: Tobacco — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-processing/china-taiwan-province-of/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-processing/china-taiwan-province-of/philippines/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Philippines: Tobacco — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
44 places, 2,332 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.