Latvia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Tobacco — Other uses

Latvia
118 t
in 2013
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
199.91 t
in 2013
Latvia rank
162nd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
161st

Tobacco — Other uses over time

  • Latvia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119872013

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 199.91 t against 118 t in Latvia, a difference of 81.91 t.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.7 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 162nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 161st of 171 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 1,988 t 108.83 t 1,879 t Latvia
2000s 2,151 t 176.48 t 1,975 t Latvia
2010s 125.5 t 195.5 t 70 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — other uses, Latvia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 199.91 t against 118 t in Latvia as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — other uses between Latvia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
81.91 t, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Latvia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for tobacco — other uses?
Latvia ranks 162nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 161st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Tobacco — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-other-uses-non-food/latvia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-other-uses-non-food/latvia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Latvia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Tobacco — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,338 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.