Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Tobacco — Other uses

Central African Republic
1,015 t
in 2013
Kiribati
833.18 t
in 2013
Central African Republic rank
139th
Kiribati rank
142nd

Tobacco — Other uses over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Kiribati
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119872013

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 1,015 t against 833.18 t in Kiribati, a difference of 181.82 t.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 142nd of 171 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 137.86 t 39.67 t 98.19 t Central African Republic
1970s 889.73 t 43.3 t 846.43 t Central African Republic
1980s 661.45 t 49.71 t 611.75 t Central African Republic
1990s 1,158 t 77.64 t 1,080 t Central African Republic
2000s 870.53 t 155.39 t 715.14 t Central African Republic
2010s 1,126 t 292.3 t 833.88 t Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — other uses, Central African Republic or Kiribati?
Central African Republic, at 1,015 t against 833.18 t in Kiribati as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — other uses between Central African Republic and Kiribati?
181.82 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Kiribati?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Central African Republic and Kiribati rank globally for tobacco — other uses?
Central African Republic ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 142nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Tobacco — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-other-uses-non-food/central-african-republic/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-other-uses-non-food/central-african-republic/kiribati/">Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Tobacco — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,338 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.