Land Locked Developing Countries vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tobacco — Losses

Land Locked Developing Countries
3,032 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
7,106 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Tobacco — Losses over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119872013

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 7,106 t against 3,032 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 4,074 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 5 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 957.56 t 503.44 t 454.11 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1970s 1,459 t 1,251 t 207.8 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1980s 885.5 t 1,099 t 213.4 t United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 1,709 t 2,328 t 618.7 t United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 1,596 t 3,329 t 1,732 t United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 2,952 t 8,407 t 5,455 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — losses, Land Locked Developing Countries or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 7,106 t against 3,032 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — losses between Land Locked Developing Countries and United Republic of Tanzania?
4,074 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for tobacco — losses?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 5 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tobacco — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-losses/land-locked-developing-countries/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-losses/land-locked-developing-countries/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tobacco — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Losses
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
45 places, 2,327 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.