Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Tea leaves β€” Area harvested

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
150,007 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
35,050 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th
Rwanda rank
14th

Tea leaves β€” Area harvested over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 150,007 ha against 35,050 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 114,957 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.3 times Rwanda's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 26 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 23,690 ha 719.67 ha 22,970 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 40,693 ha 3,716 ha 36,977 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 45,271 ha 10,364 ha 34,907 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 69,533 ha 9,885 ha 59,648 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 88,426 ha 12,292 ha 76,134 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 108,666 ha 17,147 ha 91,519 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 144,261 ha 30,157 ha 114,104 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tea leaves β€” area harvested, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Rwanda?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 150,007 ha against 35,050 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in tea leaves β€” area harvested between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda?
114,957 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda rank globally for tea leaves β€” area harvested?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tea leaves β€” Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Tea leaves β€” Area harvested. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tea-leaves-area-harvested/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tea-leaves-area-harvested/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/rwanda/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Tea leaves β€” Area harvested</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tea leaves β€” Area harvested
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
77 places, 4,512 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.