Malawi vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Tea (including mate) β€” Losses

Malawi
10 1000 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS)
2 1000 t
in 2023
Malawi rank
12th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
15th

Tea (including mate) β€” Losses over time

  • Malawi
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
02.557.510201020162023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 10 1000 t against 2 1000 t in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 8 1000 t.

That makes Malawi's figure about 5.0 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 12th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 15th of 53 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2010s 2.7 1000 t 0 1000 t 2.7 1000 t Malawi
2020s 10.75 1000 t 1.25 1000 t 9.5 1000 t Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tea (including mate) β€” losses, Malawi or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Malawi, at 10 1000 t against 2 1000 t in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in tea (including mate) β€” losses between Malawi and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
8 1000 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for tea (including mate) β€” losses?
Malawi ranks 12th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 15th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tea (including mate) β€” Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Tea (including mate) β€” Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tea-including-mate-losses/malawi/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tea-including-mate-losses/malawi/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Malawi vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Tea (including mate) β€” Losses</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tea (including mate) β€” Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,049 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.