Rwanda vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tea (including mate) — Export quantity

Rwanda
17 1000 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
22 1000 t
in 2023
Rwanda rank
17th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Tea (including mate) — Export quantity over time

  • Rwanda
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010203040201020162023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 22 1000 t against 17 1000 t in Rwanda, a difference of 5 1000 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Rwanda ranks 17th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 157 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 25.1 1000 t 26.5 1000 t 1.4 1000 t United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 31.5 1000 t 22.75 1000 t 8.75 1000 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tea (including mate) — export quantity, Rwanda or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 22 1000 t against 17 1000 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in tea (including mate) — export quantity between Rwanda and United Republic of Tanzania?
5 1000 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for tea (including mate) — export quantity?
Rwanda ranks 17th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tea (including mate) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tea (including mate) — Export quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tea-including-mate-export-quantity/rwanda/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tea-including-mate-export-quantity/rwanda/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Rwanda vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tea (including mate) — Export quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tea (including mate) — Export quantity
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,649 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.