Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Taro — Gross Production Value

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
179,194 1000 USD
in 2024
Rwanda
74,454 1000 USD
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th
Rwanda rank
9th

Taro — Gross Production Value over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 179,194 1000 USD against 74,454 1000 USD in Rwanda, a difference of 104,740 1000 USD.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.4 times Rwanda's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 8 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 36,362 1000 USD 4,529 1000 USD 31,833 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 39,649 1000 USD 8,162 1000 USD 31,486 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 55,127 1000 USD 14,657 1000 USD 40,470 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 67,711 1000 USD 31,854 1000 USD 35,857 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 104,139 1000 USD 45,865 1000 USD 58,274 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 105,491 1000 USD 53,634 1000 USD 51,857 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 129,172 1000 USD 72,188 1000 USD 56,984 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taro — gross production value, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Rwanda?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 179,194 1000 USD against 74,454 1000 USD in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in taro — gross production value between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda?
104,740 1000 USD, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda rank globally for taro — gross production value?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 8 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Taro — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Taro — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/taro-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/taro-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/rwanda/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Taro — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taro — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
54 places, 3,337 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.