Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sweets and sugars — Protein supply — Value

Lithuania
0.6 g/cap/d
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.6 g/cap/d
in 2023
Lithuania rank
97th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
97th

Sweets and sugars — Protein supply — Value over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.6 g/cap/d against 0.6 g/cap/d in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 g/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 97th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 97th of 163 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2010s 0.68 g/cap/d 0.58 g/cap/d 0.1 g/cap/d Lithuania
2020s 0.65 g/cap/d 0.7 g/cap/d 0.05 g/cap/d Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sweets and sugars — protein supply — value, Lithuania or Sao Tome and Principe?
Lithuania, at 0.6 g/cap/d against 0.6 g/cap/d in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in sweets and sugars — protein supply — value between Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 g/cap/d, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sweets and sugars — protein supply — value?
Lithuania ranks 97th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 97th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sweets and sugars — Protein supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sweets and sugars — Protein supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sweets-and-sugars-protein-supply-value/lithuania/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sweets-and-sugars-protein-supply-value/lithuania/sao-tome-and-principe/">Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sweets and sugars — Protein supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sweets and sugars — Protein supply — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.