Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Sweet potatoes β€” Losses

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
902 1000 t
in 2023
Rwanda
99 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
Rwanda rank
8th

Sweet potatoes β€” Losses over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Rwanda
02004006008001.0k201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 902 1000 t against 99 1000 t in Rwanda, a difference of 803 1000 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 9.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 28 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 572.2 1000 t 75 1000 t 497.2 1000 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 849.75 1000 t 99.5 1000 t 750.25 1000 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sweet potatoes β€” losses, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Rwanda?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 902 1000 t against 99 1000 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in sweet potatoes β€” losses between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda?
803 1000 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Rwanda rank globally for sweet potatoes β€” losses?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sweet potatoes β€” Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Sweet potatoes β€” Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sweet-potatoes-losses/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sweet-potatoes-losses/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/rwanda/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Rwanda: Sweet potatoes β€” Losses</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sweet potatoes β€” Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 1,802 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.