Kenya vs Niger: Sweet potatoes — Feed
Sweet potatoes — Feed over time
- Kenya
- Niger
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 26 1000 t against 20 1000 t in Niger, a difference of 6 1000 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.3 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Niger ahead.
Kenya ranks 21st and Niger ranks 23rd of 124 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 6.33 1000 t | 6.33 1000 t | Niger |
| 2020s | 29.5 1000 t | 15.25 1000 t | 14.25 1000 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sweet potatoes — feed, Kenya or Niger?
- Kenya, at 26 1000 t against 20 1000 t in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sweet potatoes — feed between Kenya and Niger?
- 6 1000 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Niger?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Niger rank globally for sweet potatoes — feed?
- Kenya ranks 21st and Niger ranks 23rd of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sweet potatoes — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.