Curacao vs Italy: Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Curacao
0 sq. km per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Italy
0 sq. km per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Curacao rank
179th
Italy rank
177th
Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time
- Curacao
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Curacao, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Italy ahead.
Curacao ranks 179th and Italy ranks 177th of 211 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | Curacao |
| 2010s | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | Curacao |
| 2020s | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Curacao or Italy?
- Italy, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Curacao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Curacao and Italy?
- 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Italy?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Curacao and Italy rank globally for surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp?
- Curacao ranks 179th and Italy ranks 177th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Surface area (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.