Which has higher surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Costa Rica or Turks and Caicos Islands?

Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica as of 2024.

What is the difference in surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Costa Rica and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Turks and Caicos Islands?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Costa Rica

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Turks and Caicos Islands

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Costa Rica rank

145th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

144th

Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Costa Rica
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 145th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 144th of 211 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Turks and Caicos Islands	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Costa Rica or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Costa Rica and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for surface area (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Costa Rica ranks 145th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 144th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/surface-area-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/costa-rica/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/surface-area-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/costa-rica/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Costa Rica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Surface area (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 259 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 November 2026

Surface area (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.