Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
1.06 sq. km per square kilometre
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.02 sq. km per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
33rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
36th

Surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.250.50.7511.2196119922024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.06 sq. km per square kilometre against 1.02 sq. km per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.04 sq. km per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.05 sq. km per square kilometre 1.21 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1561 sq. km per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 1.06 sq. km per square kilometre 1.21 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1478 sq. km per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 1.08 sq. km per square kilometre 1.21 sq. km per square kilometre 0.1265 sq. km per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 1.06 sq. km per square kilometre 1.16 sq. km per square kilometre 0.103 sq. km per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 1.05 sq. km per square kilometre 1.14 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0913 sq. km per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 1.05 sq. km per square kilometre 1.04 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0107 sq. km per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.06 sq. km per square kilometre 1.02 sq. km per square kilometre 0.0388 sq. km per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Hong Kong, at 1.06 sq. km per square kilometre against 1.02 sq. km per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.04 sq. km per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/surface-area-sq-km-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/surface-area-sq-km-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/">Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Surface area (sq. km), per square kilometre
Unit
sq. km per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,584 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Surface area (sq. km) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.