Lithuania vs Sweden: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed

Lithuania
0 1000 t
in 2018
Sweden
0 1000 t
in 2020
Lithuania rank
11th
Sweden rank
11th

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sweden
0102030201420172020

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 1000 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 11th of 32 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar (raw equivalent) — feed, Lithuania or Sweden?
Lithuania, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Sweden as of 2018.
What is the difference in sugar (raw equivalent) — feed between Lithuania and Sweden?
0 1000 t, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for sugar (raw equivalent) — feed?
Lithuania ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 11th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
54 places, 650 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.