Hungary vs Spain: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed

Hungary
1 1000 t
in 2023
Spain
0 1000 t
in 2018
Hungary rank
9th
Spain rank
11th

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed over time

  • Hungary
  • Spain
050100150200201020162023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 1 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Spain, a difference of 1 1000 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 9th and Spain ranks 11th of 32 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar (raw equivalent) — feed, Hungary or Spain?
Hungary, at 1 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar (raw equivalent) — feed between Hungary and Spain?
1 1000 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Spain?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Hungary and Spain rank globally for sugar (raw equivalent) — feed?
Hungary ranks 9th and Spain ranks 11th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
54 places, 650 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.