Finland vs Sri Lanka: Sugar Crops — Processing
Sugar Crops — Processing over time
- Finland
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 516 1000 t against 397 1000 t in Finland, a difference of 119 1000 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 88th and Sri Lanka ranks 85th of 128 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 470.7 1000 t | 435.8 1000 t | 34.9 1000 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 383.75 1000 t | 530 1000 t | 146.25 1000 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar crops — processing, Finland or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 516 1000 t against 397 1000 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar crops — processing between Finland and Sri Lanka?
- 119 1000 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Sri Lanka?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Sri Lanka rank globally for sugar crops — processing?
- Finland ranks 88th and Sri Lanka ranks 85th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar Crops — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.