Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar Crops Primary: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)
Sugar Crops Primary: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 2.68 million 1000 Int$ against 1.34 million 1000 Int$ in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.34 million 1000 Int$.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th of 198 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 664,033 1000 Int$ | 642,016 1000 Int$ | 22,018 1000 Int$ | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 929,393 1000 Int$ | 982,206 1000 Int$ | 52,813 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.13 million 1000 Int$ | 1.35 million 1000 Int$ | 222,081 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 1.43 million 1000 Int$ | 1.49 million 1000 Int$ | 58,620 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 1.56 million 1000 Int$ | 1.93 million 1000 Int$ | 376,360 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.39 million 1000 Int$ | 2.43 million 1000 Int$ | 1.05 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.37 million 1000 Int$ | 2.63 million 1000 Int$ | 1.26 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 2.68 million 1000 Int$ against 1.34 million 1000 Int$ in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 1.34 million 1000 Int$, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.