Barbados vs Papua New Guinea: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Barbados rank
74th
Papua New Guinea rank
71st

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Barbados
  • Papua New Guinea
0000.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Barbados, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 131 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0007 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
1970s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Papua New Guinea?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Papua New Guinea rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Barbados ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 131 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Papua New Guinea: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/papua-new-guinea/">Barbados vs Papua New Guinea: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,651 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.