Suriname vs Tunisia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Suriname
0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
105th
Tunisia rank
104th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Suriname
  • Tunisia
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0465 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0299 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0708 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Suriname or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Suriname and Tunisia?
0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Suriname ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Tunisia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/suriname/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/suriname/tunisia/">Suriname vs Tunisia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.