Spain vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Spain
0.2725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain rank
64th
Zambia rank
62nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Spain
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0.0143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4877 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1970s 0.6403 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.7783 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.7097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.4966 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3465 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.3102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.2317 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Spain or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Spain and Zambia?
0.0143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Zambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Spain and Zambia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Spain ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/spain/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/spain/zambia/">Spain vs Zambia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.