Rwanda vs Sweden: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Rwanda
0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.2017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
75th
Sweden rank
72nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sweden
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.2017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Sweden ahead.

Rwanda ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 134 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1996 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1949 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0633 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.1114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1637 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.1826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.1992 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Rwanda or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.2017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Rwanda and Sweden?
0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Rwanda ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sweden: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/rwanda/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/rwanda/sweden/">Rwanda vs Sweden: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.