Nepal vs Panama: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Nepal
0.9801 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
44th
Panama rank
43rd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Nepal
  • Panama
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9801 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.0799 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 44th and Panama ranks 43rd of 134 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5513 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.0873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9951 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.1846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.4573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.7355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.9997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Nepal or Panama?
Panama, at 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9801 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Nepal and Panama?
0.0799 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Panama rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Nepal ranks 44th and Panama ranks 43rd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Panama: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/nepal/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/nepal/panama/">Nepal vs Panama: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.