Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Myanmar
0.7892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.7585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Myanmar
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0.7892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.1156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.2187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.399 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.2552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3838 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.5189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0651 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 0.7423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 0.8006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
Myanmar, at 0.7892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
0.0307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Myanmar ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/myanmar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/myanmar/zimbabwe/">Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.