Morocco vs Rwanda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Morocco
0.1939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
73rd
Rwanda rank
75th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Morocco
  • Rwanda
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0.1939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Morocco ranks 73rd and Rwanda ranks 75th of 134 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0869 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 0.1976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 0.3417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0633 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2784 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 0.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 0.4074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 0.3883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 0.3121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1992 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Morocco or Rwanda?
Morocco, at 0.1939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Morocco and Rwanda?
0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Rwanda?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Rwanda rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Morocco ranks 73rd and Rwanda ranks 75th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Rwanda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/morocco/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/morocco/rwanda/">Morocco vs Rwanda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.