Mauritius vs World: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mauritius
55.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
World
0.7996 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
1st
World rank
1st

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mauritius
  • World
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 55.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7996 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in World, a difference of 54.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 68.9 times World's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 134 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius World Difference Ahead
1960s 116.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 115.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 128.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 128.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 122.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 122.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 117.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 116.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 109.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.592 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 108.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 86.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7414 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 85.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 56.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 55.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mauritius or World?
Mauritius, at 55.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7996 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mauritius and World?
54.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and World?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and World rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mauritius ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs World: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mauritius/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mauritius/world/">Mauritius vs World: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.