Iraq vs Malaysia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iraq
0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
120th
Malaysia rank
122nd

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iraq
  • Malaysia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.4 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Iraq ranks 120th and Malaysia ranks 122nd of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 0.0198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1968 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iraq or Malaysia?
Iraq, at 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iraq and Malaysia?
0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Malaysia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iraq ranks 120th and Malaysia ranks 122nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Malaysia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iraq/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iraq/malaysia/">Iraq vs Malaysia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.