Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Indonesia
0.7397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.7585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.7585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 134 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1970s 0.3462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 0.5917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.399 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1928 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 0.7279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3838 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 0.6308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 0.6654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1909 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 0.7464 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.7585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Indonesia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/indonesia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/indonesia/zimbabwe/">Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.