Indonesia vs Saint Lucia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)
Indonesia
0.7397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
0.7361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Indonesia rank
49th
Saint Lucia rank
50th
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time
- Indonesia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.7397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 49th and Saint Lucia ranks 50th of 134 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Indonesia or Saint Lucia?
- Indonesia, at 0.7397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Indonesia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Saint Lucia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1965.
- How do Indonesia and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Indonesia ranks 49th and Saint Lucia ranks 50th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.