Guyana vs Uruguay: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guyana
0.1442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
78th
Uruguay rank
79th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guyana
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 0.1442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 78th and Uruguay ranks 79th of 134 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1970s 0.8729 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 0.7734 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5554 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 0.6985 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.605 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 0.7136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0519 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 0.5322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0996 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 0.1821 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guyana or Uruguay?
Guyana, at 0.1442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guyana and Uruguay?
0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Uruguay rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guyana ranks 78th and Uruguay ranks 79th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Uruguay: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guyana/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guyana/uruguay/">Guyana vs Uruguay: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.