Guatemala vs India: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guatemala
10.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
5th
India rank
8th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guatemala
  • India
051015196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 10.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 2.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.4 times India's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

Guatemala ranks 5th and India ranks 8th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and India in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1970s 1.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre India
1980s 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 5.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 7.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 11.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 10.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guatemala or India?
Guatemala, at 10.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guatemala and India?
2.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and India rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guatemala ranks 5th and India ranks 8th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs India: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guatemala/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guatemala/india/">Guatemala vs India: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.