Ghana vs Tunisia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ghana
0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
101st
Tunisia rank
104th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ghana
  • Tunisia
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Ghana ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 104th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0144 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
1970s 0.041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 0.0205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0708 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
2010s 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
2020s 0.0307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ghana or Tunisia?
Ghana, at 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ghana and Tunisia?
0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Tunisia rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ghana ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 104th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Tunisia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ghana/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ghana/tunisia/">Ghana vs Tunisia: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.