Eswatini vs Thailand: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
4th
Thailand rank
7th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Thailand
051015196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 5.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Thailand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 4th and Thailand ranks 7th of 134 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2375 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 4.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 9.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 9.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 12.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 14.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 14.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Thailand?
Eswatini, at 13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Thailand?
5.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Thailand rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 4th and Thailand ranks 7th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Thailand: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/thailand/">Eswatini vs Thailand: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.