Egypt vs Uganda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt
1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
33rd
Uganda rank
31st

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Egypt
  • Uganda
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Egypt ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 31st of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.3535 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.4481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.6497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.9077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Uganda?
0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Uganda rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Egypt ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 31st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Uganda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/uganda/">Egypt vs Uganda: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.