Ecuador vs Grenada: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada
1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
39th
Grenada rank
37th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Grenada
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.

Ecuador ranks 39th and Grenada ranks 37th of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Grenada in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Grenada Difference Ahead
1960s 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
1970s 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 0.9156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 0.8124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8624 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 1.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Grenada?
Grenada, at 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Grenada?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Grenada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Grenada rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 39th and Grenada ranks 37th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Grenada: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/grenada/">Ecuador vs Grenada: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.